Will informal BTL's be recounted? For example the 50 Waggrakine BTL informals as per my previous post?
I think this is a fair outcome. Noone (well... not many...) is questioning the accuracy of BTLs that have been reentered twice in the data entry process.
Next update tonight hopefully
WA BTL Votes worthy of Interest.
ReplyDeletehttp://democracy-at-work.blogspot.com.au/2013/10/wa-senate-recount-ballot-papers-worthy.html
Unfortunately I do not have a source location list for each batch allocation as this would assist in narrowing down the list even more
The odds are that the gap between them will widen not swing.
It is estimated that a recount of the WA Senate will costs taxpayers around $100,000
Had the AEC provided Scrutineers access to the preference data-file then these votes would have been subjected to more detailed scrutiny during the initial count and possibly avoid the need for a recount